🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.